The upcoming U.S. Senate race in Maine has been making headlines recently, with Democrat candidate Graham Platner emerging as the current frontrunner in the primary. However, what has caught the attention of many is the revelation that Platner has been proudly sporting an SS Death Head tattoo for the past 18 years. This has caused quite a stir in the political world, with many questioning the candidate’s judgment and character. But amidst the controversy, there are those who have come to Platner’s defense, including the popular conservative website Breitbart and journalist Matt Yglesias.
Breitbart’s John Nolte recently published an article titled “Bulwark, Matt Yglesias Embrace Graham ‘Nazi Tattoo’ Platner,” in which he defends the candidate and criticizes those who have been quick to label him as a Nazi sympathizer. Nolte argues that the tattoo, which features the infamous SS symbol, does not automatically make Platner a Nazi, and that it is unfair to judge him solely based on this one aspect of his life.
Nolte points out that Platner has openly admitted to getting the tattoo when he was just 18 years old, and that he has since regretted his decision. He has even gone as far as to cover up the tattoo with a new design, showing that he has grown and changed since his younger days. Nolte also highlights Platner’s impressive resume, which includes serving in the military and working as a successful businessman, as evidence of his character and dedication to his country.
But Nolte’s defense of Platner does not stop there. He also calls out the hypocrisy of those who have attacked the candidate, pointing to the fact that many politicians and public figures have had questionable pasts, yet are not held to the same standard. He mentions former President Bill Clinton’s affair with Monica Lewinsky and current President Donald Trump’s past controversial statements as examples of this double standard.
In addition to Breitbart, journalist Matt Yglesias has also come to Platner’s defense. In a series of tweets, Yglesias argues that while the tattoo may be offensive, it does not necessarily reflect Platner’s current beliefs and values. He also points out that Platner’s opponent, Republican Senator Susan Collins, has a history of supporting controversial policies, such as her vote to confirm Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
Yglesias also brings attention to the fact that Platner has publicly apologized for his tattoo and has taken steps to cover it up, showing that he is willing to take responsibility for his actions and move forward. He argues that this should be taken into consideration when judging the candidate’s character.
In the midst of all the controversy, it is important to remember that people can change and grow. Platner’s past mistake should not define him as a person or a candidate. Instead, we should focus on his qualifications, values, and plans for the future. It is also important to recognize that everyone makes mistakes, and it is how we learn from them and move forward that truly matters.
In conclusion, while Platner’s SS Death Head tattoo may have caused a stir, it should not overshadow his accomplishments and potential as a candidate. It is unfair to label him as a Nazi sympathizer based on one aspect of his life, especially when he has openly acknowledged his mistake and taken steps to rectify it. Let us focus on the issues and qualifications of the candidates rather than getting caught up in sensationalized controversies. After all, our country deserves leaders who are dedicated, responsible, and willing to learn from their past mistakes.
