Marlow: Eight Reasons I Called for the Prosecution of Letitia James for Conspiracy Against Trump’s Civil Rights Ahead of DOJ Bombshell

In his latest book, “Breaking the Law,” journalist and bestselling author Alex Marlow makes a bold claim: New York Attorney General Letitia James actively worked against President Trump’s civil rights, despite being tasked with upholding them. With undeniable evidence and insightful analysis, Marlow presents eight clear reasons why James must be held accountable for her actions.

First and foremost, James has shown a clear bias against President Trump since his campaign days. She publicly stated, “Donald Trump is a racist who should not hold the highest office in the country,” and continuously used her platform to criticize and obstruct his policies. It is clear that her personal views have heavily influenced her duties as a public servant.

James also opened a baseless investigation into Trump’s business dealings, stating that she would “use every area of the law to investigate” him. Yet, despite her aggressive approach, she has failed to produce any concrete evidence of wrongdoing. This reeks of a politically motivated witch hunt, with James following her own agenda rather than following the law.

Moreover, in her role as Attorney General, James is responsible for defending the State of New York and its laws. However, she has repeatedly ignored her duty and instead focused on attacking Trump. This not only undermines the trust in her office but also raises questions about her true intentions.

In addition, James has been a vocal proponent of the “resistance” movement against the Trump administration. She has openly joined protests, tweeted anti-Trump sentiments, and endorsed candidates who are against the President. This level of political activism is unacceptable for someone in her position and raises doubts about her ability to uphold the law impartially.

Furthermore, James has made numerous attempts to interfere in federal investigations involving Trump’s associates. In the case of Michael Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer, James personally pushed for his cooperation and even offered him immunity. This is a clear violation of her role and shows a blatant disregard for the rule of law.

Perhaps the most concerning aspect of James’ actions is her disregard for President Trump’s constitutional rights. She has repeatedly targeted him and his businesses, without any legal basis, and has even called for his financial records to be made public. This is a clear violation of his right to privacy and due process under the law.

Moreover, James has repeatedly ignored the principle of “innocent until proven guilty.” She has continuously made baseless accusations and acted as judge and jury, without giving the President a fair chance to defend himself. This is a dangerous precedent for someone in her position, who is supposed to uphold the principles of justice and fairness.

Lastly, as Marlow points out in his book, James’ actions are in direct contradiction to the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees equal treatment under the law for all citizens. Her biased and unfounded attacks on President Trump have not only undermined his civil rights but also set a dangerous precedent for future leaders.

In light of these eight compelling reasons, it is clear that Letitia James has no intention of affording President Trump equal protection under the law. Her actions have been politically motivated, biased, and in clear violation of her duty as the Attorney General of New York. It is time for the Department of Justice to take action and hold her accountable for her conspiracy against the President’s civil rights.

In conclusion, Alex Marlow’s “Breaking the Law” is a thought-provoking and timely book that sheds light on a disturbing trend in our justice system. Letitia James’ actions, as detailed in the book, must not go unnoticed and demand a thorough investigation. As citizens, we must demand accountability from our public servants and hold them to the highest standards of integrity and impartiality. Anything less is a threat to the very foundations of our democracy.

More news