Breitbart Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow has recently made some bold statements regarding The Atlantic Editor-in-Chief Jeffrey Goldberg. In an interview on FNC’s “Sunday Morning Futures,” Marlow called Goldberg a “fabulist” and accused him of acting like he had war secrets. These comments come after Goldberg was added to a Signal chat among senior national security officials.
Marlow’s criticism of Goldberg stems from a recent article published by The Atlantic, which claimed that President Donald Trump had made disparaging remarks about fallen soldiers. The article, which cited anonymous sources, caused a stir in the media and sparked a heated debate about the credibility of the sources and the validity of the claims.
But Marlow, who has been a vocal supporter of President Trump, did not hold back in his criticism of Goldberg and The Atlantic. He accused Goldberg of being a “Trump-hating fabulist” and suggested that the editor had no real insider knowledge about the military or national security.
In the interview, Marlow stated, “Jeffrey Goldberg is a fabulist. He’s someone who has acted like he had war secrets when he was added to this Signal chat. He’s someone who has been a Trump-hater from the beginning.”
Marlow’s comments shed light on the ongoing feud between President Trump and the media, particularly The Atlantic. The president has vehemently denied the claims made in the article and has called for Goldberg to reveal his sources. However, Goldberg has stood by his reporting and has defended the use of anonymous sources.
But Marlow’s accusations go beyond just questioning the credibility of the sources. He also suggests that Goldberg’s anti-Trump bias may have influenced his reporting. Marlow’s use of the term “fabulist” implies that Goldberg may have fabricated or exaggerated the claims in order to fit his own agenda.
This is not the first time that Goldberg has been accused of being biased against President Trump. In fact, he has been a vocal critic of the president since the 2016 election. Many have pointed out that The Atlantic has a history of publishing anti-Trump articles, and some have even accused the publication of being a mouthpiece for the Democratic Party.
Marlow’s comments have sparked a debate about the role of the media in today’s political climate. While the media is meant to be a source of unbiased information, many argue that it has become increasingly partisan and has lost its objectivity. Marlow’s criticism of Goldberg and The Atlantic is just one example of this trend.
But Marlow’s comments also highlight the importance of responsible journalism. In today’s fast-paced media landscape, it is easy for journalists to get caught up in the race for breaking news and forget about the importance of fact-checking and verifying sources. This can lead to the spread of misinformation and the erosion of public trust in the media.
In the end, Marlow’s words serve as a reminder to all journalists to uphold the principles of ethical and responsible reporting. It is crucial for the media to maintain its integrity and credibility, especially in times of political turmoil.
In conclusion, Alex Marlow’s comments about Jeffrey Goldberg and The Atlantic have sparked a heated debate about the role of the media in today’s political landscape. While some may dismiss Marlow’s criticism as partisan, it serves as a reminder for journalists to uphold the principles of responsible journalism. As for Goldberg, only time will tell if his reporting will stand the test of scrutiny and if he truly had insider knowledge or was just a “fabulist” as Marlow suggests.
